Oddball Norton Commandos

(Page 5 of 6)

Article Tools
Bookmark and Share

But the P10 engine is shelved, and  for good reason: It is complex (the cams were driven by one long timing chain running through tunnels on the outside of the engine), expensive to make and — critically — less powerful than the 750 Atlas.

RELATED CONTENT

Faced with an urgent need for a new bike, Norton’s Bernard Hooper, in an inspired piece of lateral thinking, suggests putting the old Atlas engine in Bauer’s frame. OK, says Poore, build it — adding that it has to be ready for the 1967 Earls Court show in London, just three months away.

But Bauer designed his frame around the unit construction P10 engine, where the swingarm could be attached directly to the power unit. Part of Hooper’s dilemma is that the separate Atlas engine and gearbox first have to be mounted in a sub-frame to which the swingarm can be attached.

Hooper, an experienced development engineer, and his assistant Bob Trigg set to. They make the show — just.

In Hooper’s Commando, rubber buffers are enclosed in two cross-frame tubes mounted on the engine plates. The buffers bolt to the frame, allowing the powertrain to vibrate without transmitting its shuddering to the rider. Lateral movement is controlled by shims — it’s said this was Poore’s contribution. A notorious cheapskate, he apparently nixed screw adjusters in favor of cheaper shims, which required awkward and time-consuming fettling by the owner. Vernier adjusters did appear, but not until the last MkIII Commando in 1975.

At the time, cynics sneered that only a British manufacturer would take a bike with an obsolete engine (the Atlas), and a great frame (the legendary Featherbed), then ditch the frame and keep the engine! Nevertheless, the Commando was a critical and commercial success. It went on to win Motorcycle of the Year in British rider polls five years in a row, while staving off the collapse of the British motorcycle industry.

Owners reviews
Tony Duffett, R model:
“I like the older style touches, like the twin leading shoe brake,” Tony says. “The early models — like the R — also came with a narrower front tire, so they’re a little quicker handling.” Tony has also heard from various sources that the R came with a different profile camshaft. “This one is a really strong motor. It makes great power,” he says, especially compared with the 1971 Roadster he also owns. “I also prefer the sound that you get from the earlier style Dominator exhausts. They’ve got a deeper, throatier sound. Overall? “It’s a great around town motorcycle.”

Page: << Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next >>


Save $5 when you subscribe today!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
 
The sound and the fury: celebrate the machines that changed the world! Subscribe to Motorcycle Classics today!

Motorcycle Classics is America's premier magazine for collectors and enthusiasts, dreamers and restorers, newcomers and life long motorheads who love the sound and the beauty of classic bikes. Every issue  delivers exciting and evocative articles and photographs of the most brilliant, unusual and popular motorcycles ever made!

Save Even More Money with our RALLY-RATE plan!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our RALLY-RATE automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $4.95 and get 6 issues of Motorcycle Classics for only $24.95 (USA only).

Or, Bill Me Later and I'll pay just $29.95 for a one year subscription!