BSA Fury and Triumph Bandit: The Forgotten Twins

Planned for 1971, the double overhead cam 350cc twin BSA-Triumph Fury and Bandit never made it to production.


| November/December 2013



1971 350 BSA Fury

In 1971, BSA-Triumph was poised to release an all-new double overhead cam 350cc twin to take on Honda’s reigning middleweight, the CB/CL 350.

Photo By Robert Smith

1971 BSA Fury
Claimed power:
34hp @ 9,000rpm
Top speed: 100mph (est.)
Engine: 349cc air-cooled DOHC 180-degree parallel twin, 63mm x 56mm bore and stroke, 9.5:1 compression ratio
Weight (dry): 345lb (157kg)
Fuel capacity/MPG: 2.5gal (9.5ltr)

In 1971, BSA-Triumph was poised to release an all-new double overhead cam 350cc twin to take on Honda’s reigning middleweight, the CB/CL 350. Unfortunately, BSA-Triumph’s slide into bankruptcy couldn’t be stopped and the 350 never had a chance to make a difference.

By the mid-1960s, a Honda-led Japanese invasion of high-tech twins with electric start and dazzling performance had conquered the U.K. middleweight market, killing off England’s old-fashioned 4-stroke singles and wheezing 2-strokes. The British 650s had been considered safe because the “Japanese only make small bikes,” but that changed as well with the arrival of the CB450 “Black Bomber” in 1965. The British industry was under siege.

With its home sales quickly drying up, BSA-Triumph was forced to focus on the only market where its big twins were in increasing demand: the U.S. The success of Triumph-based “desert sleds” in enduro racing, together with BSA and Triumph’s success in the Grand National championships with Dick Mann, Gene Romero and Gary Nixon, and wins at Daytona for Don Burnett, Buddy Elmore and Nixon all contributed to demand for the big British bikes.

But while Brits still ruled in the over-500cc class in the U.S., Honda dominated the increasingly important middleweight market. By the mid-1960s, American BSA and Triumph dealers were clamoring for a “hot” 350 to compete with the best-selling Honda CB350 street bike and CL350 scrambler. BSA-Triumph had nothing competitive, but could they come up with a new middleweight machine to challenge Honda in the U.S. and rebuild their lost middleweight business at home?

tonyc
12/5/2013 8:10:37 PM

I remember well the teasing "launch" of this bike in the US. I was eagerly awaiting one to show up at my local Triumph dealer; think I even had the brochure at one time. Sorry to see that it never came to pass. Thanks for publishing this article. Well researched and written.


keith robinson
11/10/2013 10:35:32 PM

its hopwoods triples that should have been marketed.


davidm
11/9/2013 7:49:34 AM

I see this artical about the 350 twins and get excited by what could have been. Then after reading the artical I realize that bad design problems, poor starter, difficult access to ticklers, valve adjust and trans oil dipstick, would have doomed the bike. BSA/Tri already had a reputation for leaking oil, and bad electrics they didn't need a modern all new bike with serious problems. I personally never would have bought a bike with a left hand kicker and a weak electric start no matter how nice it looked.






bike on highway

Classic Motorcycle Touring and Events.


The latest classic motorcycle events and tours.

LEARN MORE